Skip to main content

The Lion, The Witch, and the Adaptation - Part 1 (Disney)

The Chronicles of Narnia have been on the list to read to my son for a long time. He's finally around the age I was when I began the seven-book saga, and we’ve now started read-alongs with the series. Last week, we finished The Lion, The Witch and the Wardrobe, which is the first book in the series (although not the first book chronologically.) Finishing it got the whole family excited to watch the adaptation. But which adaptation? There have been various audio versions as well as a number of theaterical productions. Let's focus on "family movie night" though. As a kid, I was a big fan of the 1988 BBC live action miniseries of the book, and the subsequent ones that they completed. I also remembered good things about the Disney version that came out in 2005. While looking up the best way to stream these two, I made a discovery. Somehow, I’d grown up unaware of both the 1967 ITV production and the 1979 animated TV movie. Would these be gems and new classics in my eyes, or trash to be avoided in favor of my nostalgia for the BBC version? Unfortunately, upon research only two serial of the ten-part 1967 production still exist, and only in poor quality. There was only one thing I could do...track down all complete versions I could actually find, and force my family to watch all of them as part of family movie night! (Given the number of adaptations and their respective lengths, we actually watched them over a number of family movie nights. I also went back and re-watched a few parts for clarity. Something about having a 3-year-old running around causes you to miss things. Also, I don’t think I’m allowed to choose movie night any more.) Over several posts, I’ll go over my thoughts with you. Spoilers, of course, may follow.


We start our adventure, dear reader, in the realm of Disney. Hot Dog! As mentioned above, I remembered this production as being a fairly good one, and likely to be the one I remembered best, since it was the most recent. After our re-watch, I can say that there's actually a lot to like about this movie version of the story. I had forgotten how surprisingly faithful it is to the source material, and I feel the added scenes actually enhance the movie a bit, often providing action and a sense of urgency and help keep the movie moving. In the beginning, they show the children experiencing Blitz, rather than simply telling you that they’re being shipped off to the countryside, or showing them leaving as in other versions. There is also a major confrontation with the wolves on a frozen river added that brings some action and tension to the middle of the story. I’m not sure that it needed it, but was happy enough with the addition. As for the cut scenes, while I did miss a few of them, I don’t think they were that big of a loss.

The acting in the Disney adaptation was fairly solid, with few exceptions. Who can say no to Liam Neeson as the voice of Aslan? Likewise, standouts in the film include James McAvoy as Mr. Tumnus and Georgie Henley as Lucy. Casting did an excellent job, and I don’t have many complaints here. However, I wasn’t entirely keen on Tilda Swinton’s take on Jadis the White Witch, but that may be because of my views on the hair and makeup in the movie, which actually won a few awards: an Academy Award, a BAFTA, and a Saturn. I suppose I understand it to a certain extent - contending with both period styles and a fantasy world must not be an easy task. Unfortunately, though, I do have major issues with the White Witch. Tilda Swinton looks like...a paler version of Tilda Swinton with dreads. Do people think her make-up and hair actually looks good here? That isn’t to say she looks awful, but stylistically, I have major issues. I’m okay with the change from dark to blonde hair, but perhaps they could have gone with a bluer shade of white for her outfit or makeup. She did bring winter to Narnia after all - she even has polar bears moving her battle chariot (fairly certain it was wolves in the book, but I am okay with this change.) Blonde hair on top of pale make-up with a pale outfit. I know we aren’t supposed to like the White Witch, but it should for reasons other than aesthetics. I might be able to forgive it, if the choices made her scarier, but I certainly don’t think they did. No matter how I come at it, I just don’t get the appeal. I can say, though, that I didn’t have any other issues with the hair and make-up in this production.

Is the Disney version my favorite? Probably not, but I do think this is one worth watching, if you're a Narnia fan. The big budget shows, even with the few complaints that I have. The make-up and hair for the White Witch really does bother me, but doesn’t completely break the movie for me. Complaints aside, the movie is full of action and feels like a quick watch, even though the runtime is 145 minutes. If I were to give it a nickname, I’d call it "Action Movie Narnia." At the very least, it moves at a fast enough pace to keep even my young boys riveted. I don’t think it will end up as a favorite of their childhood, though, and likely won’t end up in our family’s regular movie rotation. As for the movie’s merits as a Lion, The Witch and the Wardrobe adaptation? I’ll go over that once I’ve reviewed all of them. Until then, have courage For Narnia and for Aslan!

- A

Popular posts from this blog

The Matt Mercer Effect

Roleplaying games have been around for quite a long time even before the first edition of  Dungeons & Dragons was published in 1974. You can go back into the history of Commedia dell’arte (improvisational theatre) in 16th century Europe and see this form of storytelling (and, if you want to read about similar, but more recent, traditions, take a look at our posts on the Maryland Renaissance Festival .) Even before that, there were ancient historical re-enactments and storytelling in many different cultures. Modern tabletop roleplaying games are quite different, even from their 1974 form, but commonality is shared across all these. After all, we’re still just playing playground games with the assistance of rules and dice. In recent years, there's been a boom in roleplaying games due to a number of factors: The internet making it easier to find new players and even run play sessions online. General dissatisfaction with our own realities, shared or personal. One force driving th

Star Trek v. Star Trek: The Starship Enterprise's Fifty-Year Confusion

The question "what was your first Star Trek" carries a very different weight today than it did thirty-five years ago. All the classic (i.e., pre- Discovery ) series are instantly available across multiple streaming services, and the films aren't much harder to find - they were some of the first shows to be made available via streaming, in fact. And even before then, there were both broadcast and cable reruns, along with physical copies for sale and rental. For today's viewers, the question usually means "which show or movie is the one that 'clicked' for you, that made you want more?" And, from there, we can deduce what they like about the franchise - stylistically, thematically, and tonally, since Star Trek can be a lot of things for a a lot of people. But it wasn't always this way. For a while, Star Trek was only available sporadically. Even while the movies were doing well at the box office, prospective viewers were at the mercy of whoever mad

The Mission Will Be Very Safe and Fun for Everyone: Some Thoughtcrimes on Running Paranoia

  I'm sorry citizen, but the question "why hasn't there been a Paranoia post in over fifteen months" cannot be processed. Records indicate that the previous post, " [Backstory Redacted] - Getting Ready to Run Paranoia " was activated in the Year 214 of the Computer, and, as this is currently Year 214 of the Computer, your internal chronometer must be malfunctioning. Rumors that is has always been Year 214 of the Computer are treason. Please report to Internal Security for cerebral re-adjustment. Have a nice daycycle. So, why hasn't there been a post about Paranoia in fifteen months, anyway? The previous two have been quite popular , and, as I'm fond of saying, I've put more thought into this game than nearly anything else in my life, formal education included. As time went on, I found myself procrastinating on the follow-up. I didn't have enough time to work out everything I'd want to cover, I'd tell myself, or that some other top

Fun With Murder: The Narrative Ethics of Assassination Games

It's funny. As someone who views "detective" as an integral part of their personality , I sure have a lot of crime games. Well, crime media in general, especially movies, but games have certain... implications. You're the one committing the crimes , not watching other characters do them or following a protagonist as they piece together criminal events through evidence and investigation. You're right there, doing all the bad stuff yourself. Recently, in the ongoing quest to tackle my massive game backlog, I've been playing the first Tenchu game, released in 1998. I bought it because the creators would later go on to make my beloved Way of the Samurai series, but if one looked at my shelves, they could easily assume I chose it thematically, as Tenchu 's neighbors include numerous Hitman , Assassin's Creed , and Dishonored games - a subgenre we'll call "assassination games." I've seen it remarked that there's an irony that, while