Skip to main content

Analyzing Analyzing Horror

There's something of a cottage industry in dissecting people's interest and love of horror media - I've certainly delved into the discussion, myself. Nonetheless, the sheer number of words put into understanding the genre's appeal is simply staggering, to the point where I find myself asking why horror is widely subjected to unique scrutiny rarely applied to other genres. (Well, maybe porn, but I'm certainly not going to unpack that here.) So, for today's Spooky Season post, we're going to look into why the quest to understand horror's popularity remains a topic as perennial and evergreen as... well, as horror itself. After all, what's scarier than getting meta with media?

To start with, a lot of these articles present an engagement with horror that I find... odd. Many focus on the psychological effect of the fear response, the adrenaline rush that comes with being scared (from the safe distance afforded by being an audience), and even some weird stuff about the performative masculine rite of men showing that they are not, in fact, as scared as any partners (potential or current) they're experiencing the media with. Except... this doesn't really reflect the motivations behind dedicated horror fandom. To borrow a phrase from an ex who was more invested in horror than I was at the time, "this stuff's not scary... it's cool!" And having subsequently attended horror conventions and consumed a significant amount of media across various formats, I have to say that this sentiment describes the attitude of the majority of people invested in the genre. So it's clear that these thinkpieces aren't written by, or, or even about horror fans. Who are they for, then?

One obvious answer for the modern iteration is that these articles are clickbait, where the reader uninterested in horror (but curious why someone they know is, or every why a stranger would be) and the horror aficionado who pulls it up and goes "pff, nope" are of equivalent value - they both clicked the link, after all. Moreso, these are usually fundamentally low-effort pieces, referencing a handful of studies  (if any at all) and presenting a quick rundown of pat explanations. Basic fodder for the content mill. Which is simple enough, except that one could imagine a similar treatment for every genre imaginable: "What's the deal with people who like comedies" for instance, or broad psychobabble about the appeal of romances. And these exist, sure, but not to nearly the same extent as writing trying to explain horror. There are a few factors at work here - one being that horror is more inherently divisive than other genres. It's based around an instinctual reaction (whether you're scared or whether you're intrigued) that will repulse a certain percentage of the audience by default. Indeed, horror, when done well, runs a unique risk - the best works leave plenty of room for the audience to fill in details themselves, an approach that's been part of promotion since the very beginning. With just that little bit of prompting, a potential audience member might conjure up a work terrifying enough that they'll never take a chance on the real thing. How many of us imagined movies far more frightening than ever could be depicted on screen when we caught trailers or ads as kids? Plenty of people whose experiences with horror works never get past this stage are going to wonder what anyone could possibly get out of engaging with the genre, and, in the most charitable interpretation, they're the ones who read (and, most likely, write) these articles.

But there's another factor as work here, one a little more loaded: classism, and, depending on the specific horror media in question, a score of other "-isms." The stereotype is that horror is inherently trashy, and well... it often is. From works that lean into existing prejudices about ethnic and sexual minorities (and let's not the pathologizing of female desire - the lesbian vampire novel Carmilla pre-dates the far more well-known Dracula by 26 years) to industries hell-bent on extracting every possible penny from tired franchises through sequels, remakes, spinoffs, and tie-ins, from the largest studios to the tiniest indies, in movies, books, comics, television, and, of course, games. For every widely-lauded, masterfully-crafted masterpiece, there are dozens of works that are cheap, lazy... often within the same series! The result is a reputation for low-brow, and even hateful, disposable entertainment drawing its appeal from shock value, fodder for the darkest impulses of the unwashed masses. The tendency of horror supporters to not only accept, but embrace the trashiness as part of the fun doesn't help matters much, either. I can't count the number of times I've recommended a horror classic, but had to include the caveat of "just this one, ignore anything after that," but people keep buying all the works I implore friends to skip.

I don't think this baggage is at the forefront of people's minds when they write "why do people enjoy horror" pieces, but it's the context in which these articles exist, and is going to be a factor, consciously or not, in the minds of the readers and writers. Which is a pity - I'd much rather these analyses focus on the ways that fans work around, and even with, the more unfortunate elements of their favorites. "How do you cope with these realities and and how does it shape your personal fandom" is a far more interesting question to me, because it requires discussion, engagement, and reflection. Which, I think, gets to the heart of why the "Why Horror" articles bug me - they could be so much more, and of greater value to the way we enjoy and interact with art. And, freed from the implicit judgement in the framing ("I don't like horror," they seem to say, "and neither do you, so what's going on with people who do?") the lens could be applied to so many more types of work. I've never really gotten into military shooters like the Call of Duty franchise, for instance, but I'd love to hear someone who is into them unpack why, and the ways the deal with the themes, both implicit and explicit, of jingoism, American exclusivity, and the moral imperative of violence. I'd probably scroll right past a clickbait-y "Why Do People Like Military Shooters," but I love to dig deep with someone who knows, and cares, about what they're saying.

I hope that's what we do here at Never Say Dice, all year round, but most especially in this Spookiest of All Seasons. Because, y'know... even when it's not scary, the stuff is cool. And we love to talk about it with you.

- B

Send questions, comments, and "why do people write articles about articles" articles to neversaydice20@gmail.com or "X"-press yourself @neversaydice2.


 

Popular posts from this blog

Devouring "Roll for Sandwich"

Good timezone to Never Say Dice fans, adventures in Aardia, TikTok and beyond. No, I’m not the Roll for Sandwich guy (neither of us is), but if you haven’t heard of him already (or especially if you have), this week I wanted to talk about the TikTok/YouTube show Roll for Sandwich hosted by Jacob Pauwels. The premise is exactly what it sounds like: every episode, the host rolls dice to determine the various items that comprise a sandwich (except when the episode is about s’mores). He assembles the sandwich, then actually eats and critiques his random creation. If it sounds pretty niche to you... it is. You should  probably be both a bit of a foodie and a TTRPG fan in order to truly appreciate both the strange layered creations and the roleplaying references. My eldest son has been so interested in the web series that he decided he wanted to try doing it for himself. So, for the last week of summer this year, we took stock of our cupboards, made our own charts, and proceeded to consume

Be a Grinch! (in a Tabletop RPG)

The Holidays may be almost over (for a while), and we hope you’ve all enjoyed your seasonal music and movies/specials. We here at Never Say Dice have covered the infamous Star Wars Holiday Special and the new LEGO edition a few posts ago. A common thing many of us into tabletop RPGS like to do is incorporate media into our games. After all, many of us have grown up with the blending of media and the holidays as a given. It provides us a framework to build on and a common touchpoint to the people at our tables, virtual or otherwise. One classic character featured in holiday specials and commemorated in his own song is the Grinch, the avocado-green villain with strange cardiac growth problems apparently linked to his personality. The Grinch, villain though he may be, has a slew of characteristics that would make the character an excellent one at the gaming table. Those of you not familiar with Suess-lore may really only know the Grinch from the How the Grinch Stole Christmas animated

An Introduction to Risus

While roaming the internet in the late nineties/early noughties, I came across a TTRPG that was rules-lite and called itself “the anything RPG.” Want to play a high school cheerleader/samurai-in-training part-time goth enthusiast fast food cashier? The hot pink stick figure art glared back at me. Nah, not interested. But I was wrong. The stick figures were actually purple, and Risus is a surprisingly versatile, handy and down right fun TTRPG. I wouldn’t figure that out though till I discovered it again several years later. Even though it was written as a comedy system (and somewhat lighthearted response to GURPS) you really can use it for just about anything: space opera, high fantasy, pulp, vampires,western, any movie setting you could think of...seriously anything. You can read a far more detailed and interesting history in a number of other places should it strike your fancy. It is time for your Risus indoctrination introduction. Risus really is versatile and fairly easy to learn

Willy Wonka - Cartoonish Supervillian or Time Lord?

Every spring, in at least some of the religions practiced in the States, brings yet another holiday full of varied confections: Easter. For some reason, perhaps it’s the candy content or the garish colors associated with the holiday here, Willy Wonka & the Chocolate Factory seems to be the movie that most often comes to my mind. While there are other pieces of media that are more “classically Easter” entries, Willy Wonka just seems to belong here. Perhaps there’s something to those giant eggs, as well. Whatever the reason, it’s in our common consciousness around this time of year, and that has had me thinking about a couple of common internet theories. One common thought is that the titular character Willy Wonka is an incarnation of Doctor Who ’s (only semi-titular) protagonist, the Doctor. The other would have you believe that Willy Wonka is a cartoonish supervillian originating in the DC universe, most likely one of Batman’s adversaries. For this post, let’s go over the arg