Skip to main content

Workin' d8+1 to d4+1

“Get a job!” It's a refrain we're always hearing, as well as the title of a doo-wop classic, but, as that song and anyone who has tried to join the workforce can tell you it’s rarely that easy. Tabletop roleplaying games, on the other hand, offer the freedom to give your characters any employment history you can think of (within the bounds of the setting and their character build), whether it’s the thing they did before answering the call of adventure, or what they’re still doing between your game sessions. This week, we’re going to talk about the ways characters’ former (or current) jobs can flesh out their background and present new roleplaying opportunities, no matter which side of the GM screen they're on. - B

B: Of course, I start with the disclaimer that, in the game I run most (Paranoia XP/25th Anniversary), job assignment is part of the character creation process. Being Paranoia, of course, the player gets no say in this - it’s purely according to random chance the infinitesimally-coordinated plans of Friend Computer. But jobs can come up in play: characters can draw on the resources of fellow coworkers in their Secret Societies, or (more likely) get caught in the literal crossfire of competing Service Firms. I should also clarify that we're not talking about character class (in systems that use them), which are more a broad assessment of capabilities and skillsets, but, rather, specific examples in a character's backstory. Each job they’ve held tells a little about the life they’ve led and how it’s shaped their identity, sometimes in ways not covered by broader character backgrounds. Andy, you’ve had some experience with this in D&D, how have you seen characters' employment histories implemented?

A: All too often in character creation, and even in playing of those characters, employment is altogether ignored. When I first got into Dungeons and Dragons during 2nd edition, a character’s employment was never really considered. Fortunately for me, when I started playing 3rd edition, my DMs would try implementing the idea themselves... to varying results. Typically, they would give players some sort of skill or bonus to encourage their choice. The 4th edition of D&D also largely neglected this aspect of a character's background, as did the DM of the few 4E sessions I’ve played. However, 5th edition does include this as part of the character creation process. Picking your “background” is often a selection of various professions. You might have something simple and decisive such as Sailor, Gambler, or Fisher. Although, you could select a somewhat more abstract background like Folk Hero or Sage. No matter what you end up picking or develop with your DM, you'll end up with some extra skill/tool proficiencies, maybe some additional equipment, and possibly even a special feature. The Criminal/Spy background is a great example, giving a character access to a network of criminals or informants.

All of these benefits are great, but, on their own, players will still miss out on one of the important opportunities collaborative can storytelling provide. When creating your background, and, for this post, your character’s career/job specifically, you have a chance to help form the world your character will be getting to live in. Likely, there are a number of common folk your character has had dealings with on a regular basis. To take the Fisher background, for example, you might have other fishers from the docks you’ve dealt with; dock masters, bait sellers, fish-mongers that you supply on a regular basis... All of these non-player characters are big opportunities to give your world depth and possibly give your character some different ways to interact and engage with the "roleplaying" parts of RPGs. Even in other genres, a character might still have former coworkers at the replicator repair shop, as well as a former boss overseeing the place.

It is important, though, to do all of this in tandem with the person who will be running your games. Four players adding 3-4 NPCs to your world, all on their own? That can be an overwhelming prospect. Any career or background you consider should be developed collaboratively, with either the entire group or at least the DM. More than one, or even all of the players at the table, might be considering the same choice, such as Mercenaries, Acolytes or Nobles. Knowing this can give either an opportunity to make connections with the other player characters (shared histories can be helpful in games) or make you all reconsider your choices and character designs. It might even lead the whole campaign down a new path. Did everyone choose a pirate background? Sounds like you might all be on the same page for a certain type of campaign. Bugsy, how do you use the careers of the player characters to enhance your stories? What do you think of characters picking up new career paths during their adventures?

B: Jobs are good for reminding the PCs that the world doesn't revolve around them (unless you're playing something like Exalted). There are other characters living their lives, and things still take place even when the PCs aren't around. Connecting these elements  to the characters' personal backgrounds can help prevent the all-too-common problem in media where personal backstory is only revealed shortly before it becomes immediately relevant. ("If they're only showing us the detective's brother now, he's going to be either the killer or the next victim.") At the tabletop, where narrative time is at a higher premium, basic bits of world development might come across as telegraphed narrative direction - but this is less likely if they players already expect a developed past and lifetime of social connections their characters have made before the adventure begins. Even if the characters haven't had liberal jobs (if they're kids, for instance, or their unique circumstances have led them directly into their present situation), there are aspects of  their pasts that can be developed, whether it be classes at school or apprenticeships or community religious services. All of them involve some degree of interaction with the larger world, and all help to keep your characters from being the stereotypical "amnesiac friendless orphans" RPG characters can come across as.

As with so many things, my views on characters' previous experiences were influenced by my first exposure to tabletop RPGs: West End's D6 Star Wars - in this case, its use of "character templates." These weren't defined character classes like other systems of its era, but suggested starting points for what a PC might have carried over, materially and experientally, from their lives before they joined the Rebel Alliance. (You were entirely free to build your own template if none of the pre-gens fit your character idea.) With the exception of a few that were simply a specific species (Ewok, Wookie, Mon Calamari... a concept that has not aged well) most of the templates were structured about a character's last pre-Rebel job. Not all of these were legally-sanctioned, of course, and they often had some characterization direction on the way a player might portray them: Laconic Scout, Brash Pilot, Tongue-Tied Engineer, as well as the genre staples of Bounty Hunter, Smuggler, Retired Imperial Captain (a much more interesting type of character now than when I was a kid). Again, these weren't character classes - there were no skill trees or template-specific benefits. They were simply builds of characters, based on the lives they had led up to that point. And since their development, both narratively and mechanically, isn't strictly limited to what they've done up to that point, it allows for the possibility of new career paths, as Andy mentioned above. A character may have been a bored aristocrat or low-level crook beforehand, but if they choose to become a field medic after an adventure or two shows the need for one, they're free to do so. A lot of things change when people are on the run from the Empire... including careers.

This approach can also be of benefit to the GM, even if they don't have the time or resources to develop full employment histories for every single NPC they players might meet. Just having a quick idea of a character's relationship to their current position will make them feel more developed and accurate in portrayals. They have to get past a guard? Have an idea about how he feels about being a guard. Is he a young recruit whose never dealt with people much before, a stoic lifetime professional, or an old soldier running down the clock until retirement? Keeping something in mind will not only provide a little color to the situation, but might also give the PCs some ideas on how to address it. Most of all, it's more fun to make and present a world full of life and variety. Work may be a pain in real life and for your characters, but everyone experiences it a little differently, and every hour on the clock is story of its own.

Send comments and questions to neversaydice20@gmail.com or Tweet them @neversaydice2.

Popular posts from this blog

The Matt Mercer Effect

Roleplaying games have been around for quite a long time even before the first edition of  Dungeons & Dragons was published in 1974. You can go back into the history of Commedia dell’arte (improvisational theatre) in 16th century Europe and see this form of storytelling (and, if you want to read about similar, but more recent, traditions, take a look at our posts on the Maryland Renaissance Festival .) Even before that, there were ancient historical re-enactments and storytelling in many different cultures. Modern tabletop roleplaying games are quite different, even from their 1974 form, but commonality is shared across all these. After all, we’re still just playing playground games with the assistance of rules and dice. In recent years, there's been a boom in roleplaying games due to a number of factors: The internet making it easier to find new players and even run play sessions online. General dissatisfaction with our own realities, shared or personal. One force driving th

Star Trek v. Star Trek: The Starship Enterprise's Fifty-Year Confusion

The question "what was your first Star Trek" carries a very different weight today than it did thirty-five years ago. All the classic (i.e., pre- Discovery ) series are instantly available across multiple streaming services, and the films aren't much harder to find - they were some of the first shows to be made available via streaming, in fact. And even before then, there were both broadcast and cable reruns, along with physical copies for sale and rental. For today's viewers, the question usually means "which show or movie is the one that 'clicked' for you, that made you want more?" And, from there, we can deduce what they like about the franchise - stylistically, thematically, and tonally, since Star Trek can be a lot of things for a a lot of people. But it wasn't always this way. For a while, Star Trek was only available sporadically. Even while the movies were doing well at the box office, prospective viewers were at the mercy of whoever mad

The Mission Will Be Very Safe and Fun for Everyone: Some Thoughtcrimes on Running Paranoia

  I'm sorry citizen, but the question "why hasn't there been a Paranoia post in over fifteen months" cannot be processed. Records indicate that the previous post, " [Backstory Redacted] - Getting Ready to Run Paranoia " was activated in the Year 214 of the Computer, and, as this is currently Year 214 of the Computer, your internal chronometer must be malfunctioning. Rumors that is has always been Year 214 of the Computer are treason. Please report to Internal Security for cerebral re-adjustment. Have a nice daycycle. So, why hasn't there been a post about Paranoia in fifteen months, anyway? The previous two have been quite popular , and, as I'm fond of saying, I've put more thought into this game than nearly anything else in my life, formal education included. As time went on, I found myself procrastinating on the follow-up. I didn't have enough time to work out everything I'd want to cover, I'd tell myself, or that some other top

Fun With Murder: The Narrative Ethics of Assassination Games

It's funny. As someone who views "detective" as an integral part of their personality , I sure have a lot of crime games. Well, crime media in general, especially movies, but games have certain... implications. You're the one committing the crimes , not watching other characters do them or following a protagonist as they piece together criminal events through evidence and investigation. You're right there, doing all the bad stuff yourself. Recently, in the ongoing quest to tackle my massive game backlog, I've been playing the first Tenchu game, released in 1998. I bought it because the creators would later go on to make my beloved Way of the Samurai series, but if one looked at my shelves, they could easily assume I chose it thematically, as Tenchu 's neighbors include numerous Hitman , Assassin's Creed , and Dishonored games - a subgenre we'll call "assassination games." I've seen it remarked that there's an irony that, while