Skip to main content

Tabletop Replay

I've recently completed all the trophies in Marvel's Spider-Man That may sound like bragging, but that's not my intent. I already know that I’m a little late to the party. While I probably should have been spending time with other obligations or going through new games and storylines, I had an ulterior motive that had nothing to do with game accomplishments: I wanted to take my kids with me through the story this time. Perhaps I’ve robbed them of completing the story on their own at some point, or maybe it was a bonding experience they won’t forget. Only time will tell. Either way, it did get me thinking about the replayability of games, and specifically of tabletop roleplaying games. Dungeons and Dragons, to use the perennially popular system, is something that's revisited over and over. However, people are typically reusing it to have new and different adventures, rather than replaying the same adventure multiple times. We’ll often come back to the same books and movies time and again, even when we already know their plots. Should the adventure modules of our tabletop stories be any different? Let's visit that topic (and maybe we can revisit it again later).

Obviously, there's a lot to lose when you replay any digital or tabletop game. As a player, you aren’t going to be surprised by the same twists. You'll already have an idea of where the bad guys are, where the treasure (and traps) are hidden, and where the secret door leads. The dopamine hits might not come as powerfully or as plentiful.  Unless the DM has changed some of those details, you may need to bring a healthy dose of suspension of disbelief along with you to sessions. Similarly as DM, you’re not going to get the players as excited about the same things a second time through. You might not even be as excited yourself, at least not about the same things. Coming in with prior knowledge, the players may feel a bit railroaded, even if having foregone conclusions might offer them more control over the pace of the game. All of these factors can be frustrating for DM and player alike. How can we consider revisiting the same game?

Even with those drawbacks, there are a lot of reasons to go back to the same adventure module. Like that favorite book or movie, people do enjoy the familiar. If enough time has passed, they may even have forgotten some of the details. There are also all the paths the players didn't take the first time to explore. That side quest they had decided to skip. The secret door or treasure they completely missed the first time around. Sometimes, it can be just as frustrating for a DM when players have missed these things. (Darn, I really liked that NPC they didn’t get a chance to meet, the encounter they avoided that I spent ages setting up, etc.) These things might not be (literally) game changing in terms of overall story arc, but they’re like those details you only see in a movie or TV show after you've watched it multiple times. The jokes you missed the first time around.  The Easter egg of R2-D2 and C-3P0 in Raiders of the Lost Ark. A million Simpsons jokes. It's safe to say, there is a definite value in going back, but those issues mentioned earlier are still present. What can we do to combat them?

Suspension of disbelief aside, there are a few things that can help increase the enjoyment of replaying a tabletop module. Bringing in additional new people is probably the best thing you can do. Just like when you're introducing someone to a movie, you get enjoyment out of their first-time experience. This works even better with games because there's a good chance they'll do things differently than the last time around. Adding just one new person or taking a whole new group through the same scenes presents new opportunities for the DM, as well - I’ve run two different adventures twice for different groups, and the results were very different each time. You’re bound to learn something new about the adventure or the even game itself. As a player, you can also bring yourself differently to the table. Playing a Bard out for coin and cleavage is a different experience from playing a power hungry Sorcerer or kind-hearted Rogue. Both roll-players and role-players have a chance to try something new: trying out a different set of character mechanics can be satisfying for the strategic combat fan, and a new role is always welcome to those more into the acting aspects. Aside from the story itself, there are a number of other things a DM can gain from running a story again. You probably already have the tokens/miniatures and maps handy. Now you might have time to get that music you'd wanted to use, or to correct that one bit of description that just didn’t work when you read it out the first time. It's a chance to “up your game” as the facilitator. You might even be able to use re-running the same game as a chance to set up parallel universes in your setting.

Coming back to the same story might not be the easiest of tasks, but it could certainly be worthwhile. Obviously, just what you get back from revisiting a story is going to vary from person to person. Including new people, holding on to that suspension of disbelief and just trying new things in the same world can all make a big difference. You also don’t know what little secret gems you missed on the first time around. Your second, or even third, experience, is likely to be different. For myself, I’m going to look forward to revisiting the same game a few times from now on - the benefits appear to outweigh the challenges. Until next week folks, enjoy your tables. Get out there and break some dice.

- A

Send comments and questions to neversaydice20@gmail.com or Tweet them @neversaydice2 (while you still can).


 

Popular posts from this blog

Whose Labyrinthine Maze is This, Anyway: Dungeon Design and Cultural History

Dungeon . The word with significant historical connotations and some modern ones we won’t get into here, but to enthusiasts of tabletop roleplaying, it means something very specific: it’s ⅓ of the name of the most successful and influential RPG of all time, after all. (We’ll discuss the significance of the “&” another time. (and maybe the other D too - A) ) Early D&D materials refer to “the underworld mazes” (note the preposition, dungeons are considered a default part of the setting), and offer some advice on making them (somewhat) plausible, but never directly consider the societies that built them. While many pre-published adventures do include some information describing long-gone inhabitants, incorporating this kind of detail into original worlds can help create a detailed, rich setting. This week, we thought we’d talk about how to make dungeons and other ruins feel like places that lost peoples made and lived in, and how to share these details in your play sessions. - B  

The Mission Will Be Very Safe and Fun for Everyone: Some Thoughtcrimes on Running Paranoia

  I'm sorry citizen, but the question "why hasn't there been a Paranoia post in over fifteen months" cannot be processed. Records indicate that the previous post, " [Backstory Redacted] - Getting Ready to Run Paranoia " was activated in the Year 214 of the Computer, and, as this is currently Year 214 of the Computer, your internal chronometer must be malfunctioning. Rumors that is has always been Year 214 of the Computer are treason. Please report to Internal Security for cerebral re-adjustment. Have a nice daycycle. So, why hasn't there been a post about Paranoia in fifteen months, anyway? The previous two have been quite popular , and, as I'm fond of saying, I've put more thought into this game than nearly anything else in my life, formal education included. As time went on, I found myself procrastinating on the follow-up. I didn't have enough time to work out everything I'd want to cover, I'd tell myself, or that some other top

Super Cereal

Hey, It’s-a me Never Say Dice! We’ve gathered here once again to celebrate the flimsy excuse of a corporate holiday: March 10, otherwise known as Mar10 (or Mario) Day. Last year, after making a few suggestions on how you might celebrate the holiday, we discussed how details can serve as the Power-Up Mushroom for Your Narrative . We talked about what a person’s intro to Mario might have been, the story behind the "original" Super Mario Bros. on the NES, and what it could mean to us in our tabletop stories and elsewhere. Certainly, your first experience with Mario may have been a media cash grab like the one linked above. You could also have come to meet Mario later in life as part of an Olympic, Kart racing game, party game, or any number of other titles Nintendo inserted the character into. ( Mario Tennis in 3D on the Virtual Boy , maybe? Anyone? Hopefully the first time you met Mario it was at least less headache inducing.) Perhaps your first introduction to the plumber in

Combat Culture

For the past two years, this weekend has seen “ Moments of Silence ” posts, the first in response to the murder of George Floyd, and the second to comment on what had taken place in the ensuing year. This year, the weeks leading up to the anniversary have seen a number of brutal, preventable, man-made tragedies, and, given their nature, the standard litany of finger-pointing -  particularly from those desperate to draw attention from the obvious connection between mass shootings and the ready availability of firearms. In addition to their current favorite targets, both human and conceptual (funny how the blame always falls on the people they were already mad at), and something that can only be described as “architectural victim blaming” (at least Ted Cruz’s comments about doors are being roundly mocked), the old classics were trotted out, including that aging recurring villain: video games. Both of us at NSD were in the same graduating class as the Columbine shooters, so, while we wer